achievable

The “evidence” offered by opponents is not of enough quality to prove that fluoridation is ineffective or damaging. That is the cause fluoridation opponents should distort study conclusions and fabricate “evidence” to try and scare well-meaning members of the public into accepting their beliefs as true. These are precisely the very same tactics made use of by vaccination opponents and other anti-science activists. Regrettably more bonuses, worry is generally a far stronger motivation of public opinion than a viewed as discussion and evaluation of the actual scientific evidence – which can be incredibly complicated and difficult to realize. However, compounds...